Without written evidence of an inspection, no proof exists that the fire inspector gave the owner notice of hazardous conditions or the corrective measures to be taken

• A. Of Hazardous Conditions Or The Corrective Measures To Be Taken
• B. About The Date Of Inspection
• C. That An Inspection Occurred
• D. That The Owner Complied

Answer: (A)

The key idea is that written evidence must specify what the notice was about—the hazardous conditions and the corrective measures to be taken. Without documentation naming those hazards or the required actions, there’s no proof that the owner was informed of what needed to be fixed. Saying there was an inspection or when it occurred proves only that something happened or when it happened, not what was communicated to the owner. Saying the owner complied, or proving compliance, doesn’t establish that the inspector provided formal notice about the hazards or the corrective steps. Therefore, the best fit is the notice about hazardous conditions or the corrective measures to be taken.